It’s scarcely the most sexy subject in property, but why are there so many ‘green codes’ for developers building new environmentally-friendly homes?
This issue struck me as I was writing an Estates Gazette story about Britain’s builders facing a plethora of different green measurements, including:
• CRC: Carbon Reduction Commitment (or Energy Efficiency Drive), a multi-year programme where participating builders forecast emissions and then may win ‘revenue recycling payment’ subsidies if they come in under;
• BREEAM: a voluntary measurement of buildings’ eco-functionality set up by the Building Research Establishment. Developers have been clever at getting ‘excellent’ BREEAM ratings for some designs to boost their marketing;
• CfSH: The Code for Sustainable Homes is a 2006 guide of environmental best practice for house builders;
• Building Regulations Part L: this controls insulation values, window areas, doors, air permeability, heating efficiency of all heating, hot water and lighting systems, and sets out the Standard Assessment Procedure measure;
• On top of that, government is consulting over a new definition of ‘Zero Carbon’.
These are not necessarily contradictory but are certainly duplication. Isn’t there merit in starting again, creating a single definition of green credentials for house builders? Surely that would be easier for them to understand and easier for the public to understand?
If you would like to to comment on this article, click HERE to e-mail Graham.